3.
Profit/Loss System
The free market
economy is a profit and loss system.
Typically, profits are emphasized but it should be understood that
losses are equally necessary for an efficient economy. The nature of profits are sometimes
misconstrued by the general public.
Profits are not an excess charge or an act of meanness by firms. Profits are a reward to the
capitalist-entrepreneur for creating value. To understand this we must first understand the nature of
exchange. When two parties trade
they do so because they expect to receive something of greater value than that
which they surrender; otherwise they would not waste their time engaging in
exchanges. Now what is the nature
of a profit?
A businessman takes
input resources--land, labor,
materials, etc.--and recombines them to produce something different.
For example:
A car manufacturer takes
$4,000 worth of materials
$6,000 worth of labor
$1,000 worth of overhead
for a total cost of
$11,000,
and produces a car
which sells for $15,000. The only
way the car will sell for this $15,000 is if a consumer willingly parts with
the money for the car, and based on the nature of exchange he will do so only
if he prefers the car to the money.
So the entrepreneur has taken $11,000 worth of resources and refashioned
them into a car worth $15,000, thereby making a profit of $4,000. Where did the $4,000 profit come
from? The answer is it was created by the manufacturer. He caused it to come into existence. This is a creative act just as
producing an art work is a creative act.
The worth or value of
the materials, labor and overhead is what those items will sell for to willing
buyers. By refashioning them into
the car, the manufacturer has produced more value than he found in the world. Profits are a sign of value creation;
making profits deserves to be hailed and honored for benefitting mankind.
Now, take the example
of losses. Are losses an act of
kindness and not charging too much?
In essence: No. Taking the same example, with input
costs of $11,000, what if the manufacturer had produced a car that no one would
buy for more than $11,000? If the
manufacturer could not sell the car until the price was say, $8,000, then what
does this mean? It means he has
taken perfectly good resources--materials, labor and overhead--and recombined
them in such a manner that they are now worth only $8,000 to buyers. He has destroyed value in the
world. Such an act deserves condemnation
for impoverishing humanity. Had
the businessman not come on the scene the world would have been richer by
$3,000 in value.
Fortunately, in the
free market we do not have to rely on social honor or condemnation to motivate
producers to produce those goods which consumers prefer. This occurs naturally as profits allow
successful producers continued production and wider control of resources while
losses deprive others of control of resources and the ability to continue in
production.
Also, note the beauty
of the market: Any failure in
serving consumers, irrational pricing or choice of production is to that same
degree an opportunity for profits.
Thus, the market, while not perfect, is self-correcting. Reformers will better rectify any
inadequacies they detect in the market by reaping the profits available from
that inadequacy than by denouncing the very system which makes meaningful
reform possible.
Profits are a signal
to use resources to produce items highly valued by consumers and losses are a
signal to discontinue production of low-valued items. Losses are necessary to free up resources for use by those
producing valued goods. Therefore
we find that the interests of producers and consumers are harmonious, rather
than at odds.
-
Dolan, Edwin G. and David E. Lindsay
Economics, 6th edition,
(Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press, 1991) pp. 788 - 811
-
Burris, Alan
A Liberty Primer,
(Rochester, New York: Society for Individual Liberty, 1983) pp. 60 - 61
-
Gwartney, James D. and Richard L. Stroup
What Everyone Should Know About Economics and Prosperity,
(Tallahasee, Florida: James Madison Institute, 1993) pp. 21 - 23
-
Friedman, Milton and Rose
Free to Choose,
(New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1980) pp. 9 - 38
-
Hazlitt, Henry
Economics in One Lesson,
(New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House, 1979) pp. 103 - 109
-
Mises, Ludwig von
Planning for Freedom,
(South Holland, Illinois: Libertarian Press, 1974) pp. 108 - 149
-
Rand, Ayn
Atlas Shrugged,
(New York: Random House, 1957) pp. 478 - 481
-
Rothbard, Murray N.
Man, Economy, and State,
(Los Angeles: Nash Publishing, 1970) pp. 463 - 469
|