20. Money
As did language and
customs, money evolved--evolved from the process of trade in barter (trading
goods directly for goods). It did
not arise via vote or social contract or government decree.
(This last statement
may seem in conflict with the current experience wherein fiat money--money by
government decree--is the norm. Is
this not an exception to money arising from a good in trade? No. The brilliant "regression theorem" of Ludwig von
Mises demonstrates the original truth:
If one regresses through the history of our money it can be seen that
the value of our fiat money is based upon the commodity value of gold. The U.S. dollar was severed from gold
in the international arena in 1971 and in the domestic arena in 1933. Prior to these dates U.S. dollars were
redeemable in gold at $35 and $20 to the ounce, respectively. Without the experience of full gold
redeemability a paper dollar could never have become a money.)
Barter however, had
the problem of a double coincidence of wants--each party to the trade must have
and be willing to trade for that which the other party has and is willing to
trade. As barter proceeded it was
discovered by the traders themselves that certain goods were more readily
accepted in trade than other goods, thus making those more readily accepted
goods even more readily accepted in trade. A snowball effect took place. As this good became a standard in trade because of its
widespread acceptance the problem of a double coincidence of wants was solved
as money became half of all trades.
Having a money--a medium of exchange--facilitated trade and complex
business arrangements. This effectively means money is important for human
progress comparable to the wheel and fire.
Money makes possible
comparisons of value--a shirt can be bought for 1 gram of gold, and a camera
for 5 grams of gold, for instance.
Having a common denominator measure of value engendered profit and loss
assessment; without money one would have to list the entire period's exchanges
under barter resulting in a huge array of exchanges with no common value. Lastly, money serves as a store of
value, carrying value comparisons over time, lengthening the time horizon
available in carrying out productive work. Notice that to the degree an economy suffers from inflation,
money is a poorer gauge, distorting value comparisons, undermining it as a
store of value and ultimately--during hyperinflation--failing as the medium of
exchange as traders revert to a barter relationship.
-
Mises, Ludwig von
Human Action,
(Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1966) 408 - 412.
-
Paul, Ron
Ten Myths About Paper Money,
(Lake Jackson, Texas: The Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, 1983)
-
Rand, Ayn
Atlas Shrugged,
(New York: Random House, 1957) 410 - 415.
-
Rothbard, Murray N.
Man, Economy, and State,
(Los Angeles: Nash Publishing, 1970) 231 - 237.
-
Rothbard, Murray N.
What Has Government Done to Our Money?,
(Auburn, Alabama: Praxeology Press, 1990) 15 - 63.
-
Sutton, Anthony
The War on Gold,
(Seal Beach, California: '76 Press, 1977)
|