37.
The History of Economic Thought
The Spanish
Scholastics of 14th through 17th century Spain had produced a body of thought
largely similar to our modern understanding of economics. The work of these scholars was largely
lost to the English speaking world we've inherited. The French physiocrats carried the discipline forward in the
18th century with prominent economists of the time including A. R. J. Turgot
and Richard Cantillon. A strategic
error was made by these French advocates of laissez-faire as they attempted to
change policy by influencing the King to embrace free markets, only to have the
institution of monarchy itself delegitimized. Thus a guilt by association undermined the credibility of
the laissez-faire theorists.
In 1776 Scotsman Adam
Smith published The Wealth
of Nations only to set the
discipline back with his cost of production theory of value. (Smith did properly emphasize
specialization and the division of labor in his analysis.) The correct subjective theory of value
had been understood by both the Spanish Scholastics and the French
laissez-faire school. Why Adam
Smith chose the faulty cost of production theory over subjectivism is a mighty
mystery as it is clear from Smith's lecture notes that he had endorsed marginal
utility analysis prior to the publication of his book. The marginal revolution of the
1870's--with Carl Menger in Austria, William Stanley Jevons in England, and
Leon Walras in Switzerland each writing independently and in differing
languages--reestablished the correct marginal approach. As stated by Joseph Schumpeter in The
History of Economic Thought:
It is not too much to say that analytic economics
took a century to get where it could have got in twenty years after the
publication of Turgot's treatise had its content been properly understood and
absorbed by an alert profession. p. 249
Unfortunately, the
theory was perverted into a mathematized method with the rush to positivism in
the 20th century.
The Austrian
tradition of Menger was completed in the theories of Ludwig von Mises with the
application of marginal utility analysis applied for the first time to money,
which in turn led to the correct business cycle approach during the
1920's. This approach was gaining
headway in the English speaking world with F. A. Hayek's appearance in England
in the early 1930's. But in the
late 30's the well-named Keynesian Revolution displaced the Austrian
theories--not by refutation, but by neglect--taking economic theory to the
bizarre point of splitting macro-theory from an underlying micro-emphasis; a
point where it still is today.
-
Chafuen, Alejandro
Christians for Freedom,
(San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1986)
-
Rothbard, Murray N.
Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature,
(Washington, D.C.: New Libertarian Review Press, 1974)
-
Rothbard, Murray N.
Economic Thought Before Adam Smith,
(Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1995) pp. 67 - 133, 435 - 471.
-
Schumpeter, Joseph
The History of Economic Thought,
(Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1995)
-
Spiegel, Henry William
The Growth of Economic Thought,
(Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1971) pp. 215 - 217.
-
Tucker, Jeffrey
"The Economic Wisdom of the Late Scholastics," in The Economics of Liberty edited by Llewellyn Rockwell,
(Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1990)
|